Prior to beginning work on this journal:
Include a cover page and 1–2 pages of reflection regarding ideas, concepts, or strategies that you have learned so far in this simulation that you would be able to transfer to a current or a future role. Be specific about how these items can help you as you progress in your career. In this Journal, consider how the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats, along with your original strategy from Week 1, are now impacting the performance of HISCO. Also, consider how keeping track of the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of the company that you work for can help you improve your performance on an ongoing basis.
Upon completing this journal, you must save it to your computer as a Microsoft Word document (e.g., save as Smith Week Three Journal) and submit it through Waypoint.
BUS687.W4J1.06.14.24
Description:
Total Possible Score: 3.00
Content
Total: 1.00Distinguished – Responds with a thorough reflection that is related to all aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, relevant prior knowledge, and/or other real-world experiences in a manner that is rich in thought and provides valuable insight into the topic. Analyzes preconceptions and biases by deconstructing elements of personal assumptions and synthesizes own awareness using new modes of thinking.
Proficient – Responds with a reflection that is related to almost all aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, or other real-world experiences in a manner that provides valuable insight into the topic. Provides a limited analysis of preconceptions and biases and somewhat synthesizes own awareness using new modes of thinking.
Basic – Responds with a reflection that is related to most aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, or other real-world experiences in a manner that provides limited insight into the topic but may not be wholly relevant to the journal prompt. Demonstrates self-reflection by identifying preconceptions or biases compared to new modes of thinking.
Below Expectations – Responds with a reflection that is related to some aspects of the journal prompt. Attempts to apply professional, personal, or other real-world experiences, but their relevance to the journal prompt is unclear. Self-reflection is vague and/or fails to relate to preconceptions or biases and new modes of thinking.
Non-Performance – The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Coherence
Total: 1.00Distinguished – Effectively communicates ideas or points in a logical and organized manner. Reflections are sophisticated and formulate wholly appropriate and pertinent connections between the journal topic and relevant prior knowledge.
Proficient – Communicates ideas or points in a manner that is mostly logical and organized. Reflections formulate appropriate connections between the journal topic and relevant prior knowledge.
Basic – Communicates ideas or points in a manner that demonstrates a limited understanding of content organization. Attempts to reflect upon journal topic, but the connections between the journal topic and prior knowledge are vague.
Below Expectations – Attempts to communicate ideas or points; however, the content organization is extremely limited. Fails to provide a reflection that connects the journal topic to prior knowledge.
Non-Performance – The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Mechanics
Total: 1.00Distinguished – Journal contains no errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
Proficient – Journal contains only a few minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, but they do not distract the reader from the content.
Basic – Journal contains a few errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, which slightly distract the reader from the content.
Below Expectations – Journal contains major errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, which distract the reader from the content.
Non-Performance – The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Carefully review the Grading RubricLinks to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your journal.