Instructions:
After going through each and every reading in detail these are readings which are below i have provided pdf
write an original post of 250-300 words that conveys your thoughts about the following question:
We typically think of homicide as a crime and a criminal justice issue. However, as we learned in this unit, it is also a public health issue. Discuss why we continue to see homicide as a crime only and what the benefits would be of broadening our understanding of this type of violence as a public health issue.
In this course, our discussions are what we describe as ‘asynchronous’; that is, students discuss an assigned question, exchanging ideas related to this question at varying points each week. A key benefit of asynchronous online discussions is that students can participate whenever it is most convenient (although see grading rubric about timing of posts below) and can think about the weekly discussion questions before participating. In this way, students often feel better prepared as they have read and engaged with the course materials before participating (which is also one of the important aspects discussed in the grading rubric below).
The purpose of the discussion forums is to have students engage with course material and then demonstrate their understanding of course materials by expressing/explaining an idea, responding to other group members’ ideas, and/or developing a thread of ideas together as a group. In this way, students learn from the instructor, the course materials, and each other. It further provides students with ongoing opportunities to review, reflect upon, and apply new knowledge such as concepts, theories, or research findings. This will help when students are working on their two major writing assignments for this course which also requires knowledge of and engagement with course materials.
There will be diverse perspectives and that is o.k. However, all students must strive to be constructive and considerate if they disagree with any of their group members. It is okay to challenge and disagree with each other but only if it is done in a respectful manner.
Note: There is no single ‘right answer’ and the approach you describe need not reflect all of the tactics! The goal here is to generate discussion and share ideas about how best to engage in challenging conversations about climate change.
After you have made your original post, read some of the posts from your classmates and construct one reply post of 100-150 words that responds to one of your group-mate’s original posts. Your reply post should be written such that it does one or more of: identifies something that you find especially interesting or insightful about your classmate’s original post; poses an engaging and relevant question and/or builds on the ideas from your classmate’s original post; raises a real-life experience or observation that you feel would be relevant to illustrate or help further develop an idea or point in your classmate’s original post.
Please note that you will need to make an original post before you can read and respond to your peers’ posts
¨write in 260 words. follow proper guidelines as given in beginning. Use AP7 STYLE OWL PURDE. Provide reference.
Write in on own words.
¨Some points to keep in mind:
Be clear and to the point in your postings.
Edit your work. Your posts should be coherent and use proper grammar and spelling.
Keep postings to 250-300 words. Quality is better than quantity.
Contribute your own thoughts about the material you have read.
Support your thoughts by referencing the video and docx provided and other outside literature.
Raise additional questions or points of discussion to stimulate further discussion
If you have questions, show that you have already tried to find a solution.
Respect the viewpoints of your peers. Ask for clarification if you don’t understand a point. Assume good intentions.
Use the proper terminology introduced in the course readings.
When using literature in your postings, make sure to provide references in proper APA Style.
Show respect and sensitivity to peers’ gender, cultural and linguistic background, political, and religious beliefs.
You are strongly encouraged to take the time to review the following documents on writing quality discussion posting and on taking roles in discussions.
PREPARING TO WRITE1. Read assigned material—critically—and take notes as you read: Who wrote this material (a respected expert? an activist with a specific aim or belief?) Do they have any possible biases? Are studies reliable and valid? (What kind of research was performed?) When was this material written? Are the definitions/conditions/opinions described still accur vant? ate/rele Is an opinion expressed? How might someone disagree? How does this material relate to other concepts and theories you are studying? (Remember, instructors choose readings with a plan in mind—try to imagine why they have assigned this reading) Does the article complement other things you have learned? Is it in opposition? 2. Read and understand the discussion question or topic provided by your instructor • What are you asked to do? (Formulate an opinion? Respond to a question? Explain a concept or theory?) • How are you asked to do this? What kind of information are you expected to include (e.g., supporting quotations or references, examples, etc.) Do you need to bring in outside research? 3. Sort out the finer details • Is there a word maximum? Minimum? (Most posts will be 1‐2 paragraphs maximum). • How many times are you expected to post? (Find out if you are required to post a certain number of times per question, per week, etc.) • How much of your grade is this component worth? Each post? Budget your time accordinglyAre you expected to respond to other students’ posts? What proportion of original posts versus responses are you asked to provide?INITIAL POSTS – An initial post is a response to the original question presented by the course instructor, or the opening post on a particular topic (i.e., not responding to other students’ posts). Consider each post a “mini‐thesis,” in which you state a position and provide support for it. If you are responding to a question, be sure to 1. Take a position: Provide a clear answer to the question (incorporate some of the wording of the question in your answer if possible). 2. Offer a reasoned argument: Provide an explanation for your point of view, and use evidence from your text, notes, or outside research (where appropriate) to support your point. 3. Stay focused: End with a summary comment to explain the connection between your evidence and the question (how your evidence proves your point). Your post might also introduce a question or idea that others can follow up on. But make sure you have answered the question first!
Discussion Grading Rubric:
Discusssion Marking rubric.
A+ Discussion Post A+
CriteriaExcellent16 – 20 points
Posted early and continued toTimeliness make contributions throughout each week.
PostsQuantity of Posted more than three times each week.
Posts
Overall Score
Level 5
All original posts were directly related to the question, were thoughtful, and includedQuality of references to the course readings.All response posts engaged classmates in further dialogue on the topic.
48 and above
Original Initial Post(8-10 points) Length guidelines met.
writing is clear and engaging; approach clearly described, including tactics it would reflect.approach connected to/rationalized in terms of QUESTION: We typically think of homicide as a crime and a criminal justice issue. However, as we learned in this unit, it is also a public health issue. Discuss why we continue to see homicide as a crime only and what the benefits would be of broadening our understanding of this type of violence as a public health issue.
It should contain no spelling errors and typos
READINGS which have to be used
Resources and link which has to be used are five pdf which have to be analsyed and use proeprly.
NO OTHER SOURCE HAS TO BE USED ONLY these readings has to be used .
No outsource has to be used.
First you have go through these readings and
Readings are as follows:
I havae attached the pdf in order reading1,2,3,4,.
PDF Reading1:OPHA: Ontario Public Health Association. Public health approach to violence prevention [Parts 3 & 4]
OPHAPDF 1 HAS TWO DOCUMENT PART 3
PDF 2 IS DOCUMENT PART4.
PDF Reading:3
Criminology: A Sociological Understanding. Criminology and the Sociological Perspective
Barkan, S.F.
PDF READING4:
Now use most importantResources which has to be analysed properly by
Homicide studies. Recognizing homicide as a public health threat: Toward an Integration of Sociological and Public Health Perspectives in the Study of Violence
Pridemore, W.A.
PDF Reading:5
New York Times. What Murder Says About the Society It Exists In
Applebome,p
I HAVE ATTACHED THE DOCUMENT PDF ARE AS FOLLLOWS:
Documents are as folLows
pdf1:
Reading1 AND READING 2:
Now use most importantResources which has to be analysed properly by
OPHA: Ontario Public Health Association. Public health approach to violence prevention [Parts 3 & 4]
OPHA
READING 1 PDF 1PART-3
READING 2 PDF2 PART-4
Pdf3:
Reading:3
Criminology: A Sociological Understanding. Criminology and the Sociological Perspective
Barkan, S.F.
Pdf :4
READING4:
Now use most importantResources which has to be analysed properly by
Homicide studies. Recognizing homicide as a public health threat: Toward an Integration of Sociological and Public Health Perspectives in the Study of Violence
PDF5:
Reading:5
New York Times. What Murder Says About the Society It Exists In
Applebome,p
READING NO:6 A third reason why it is important to study homicide is this: although few of us will be direct victims of homicide, this does not mean we should or do remain unaffected by these events. We are bombarded with images of homicide daily and, as a result, we sometimes forget that, although rare compared to other types of crime, homicides do occur, and they happen to real people and the impact of homicide can be far-reaching. Even though we may not know those involved, we often feel the impact of these events in a variety of ways— sadness, fear, confusion, and anger. This can impact how we live our lives.
At the global level, this impact can be seen by understanding how homicidal violence can impact the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. The interplay between homicidal violence and SDGs is clearly laid out in the following figure (three images) taken from the Global Study of Homicide 2019 report. As part of your knowledge building in this course, you should note the reciprocal impacts between homicidal violence and various factors identified in the SDGs (and, yes, they are required). : (If you wish to access the UNODC Global Study of Homicide publication that expands on this figure, review the 2019 booklet, Homicide, development and the Sustainable Development Goals. It is not required, but is informative.)
Figure 1.1 Summary of the interplay between homicidal violence and the Sustainable Development Goals (Part 1)Transcript
Figure 1.2 Summary of the interplay between homicidal violence and the Sustainable Development Goals (Part 2)Transcript
Figure 1.3 Summary of the interplay between homicidal violence and the Sustainable Development Goals (Part 3)
(Source: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Global Study on Homicide: Executive Summary. Pp.8-10.)
Transcript
At the more local level, few of us remained unaffected by the Nova Scotia mass killings that occurred on April 18 and 19, 2020 across multiple communities that left at least 22 women and men dead as well as the perpetrator who was finally apprehended and killed by police. The impact of this mass homicide reverberated across the nation and will continue to have an impact for years to come. We will come back to this event later in the course.
If you feel the need to reach out for self-care assistance at any point, please start by visiting the Student Wellness Centre’s Student Resources page.
At the more academic level, research has examined how you and others around you may be affected by homicides, directly or indirectly, especially given that many of us believe that we remain unaffected. Understanding the impact on those who do know the victims or killers is also important and to help you understand this further, if interested, is a supplementary reading that discusses the health consequences of homicide on families and friends (see Mastrocinque et al. 2014).
However, one of the best ways to understand the impacts of homicide is to listen to family members or friends that have been left behind. The following video features two co-victims who spoke at the opening plenary of the Canadian Domestic Homicide Prevention Conference in 2017, co-hosted by myself and my research collaborator in London, Ontario. One woman speaks about the loss of her sister and the second woman speaks about the loss of her mother. Each of the two women are speaking about two different homicides that occurred in different parts of our country.
Before listening, see the short description of the two speakers below.
Terri Brown
Maha El-Birani
Listen to their stories:
Video: Terri Brown
Video: Maha El-Birani
Link: http://cdhpi.ca/canadian-domestic-homicide-prevention-conference-0opens a video in a new window
Finally, there is the financial cost of homicide. While there is no comparable research in Canada, one US study demonstrates that the average cost per murder exceeds $17.25 million and the average murderer costs close to $24 million. Costs include number of offenses, victim costs of crime, costs of criminal justice investigation and adjudication, cost of incarceration and so on (see Delisi et al. 2010) if you’re interested in understanding further how the monetary cost of homicide was calculated). While it is likely that these figures may be somewhat different in Canada, for argument’s sake, let’s say it can cost $15 million in Canada per homicide. In 2012, there were 543 homicides in Canada; you do the math!
please start reading intsructions mam
and guidelines and you have to answer to this i am proving the grading rubrics everythong write in own words no AI AND CHATGPT AS MAM HAS THE SOFTAWARE TO DETECT.EACH AND EVERY LINE and please can you you provide in two hours as i have less time