Essay question: In Pretty v Director of Public Prosecutions, Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening [2002] 1 AC 800 [57], Lord Steyn stated that ‘In our Parliamentary democracy … such a fundamental change cannot be brought about by judicial creativity’.
In the context of the English Legal System, to what extent do you agree with Lord Steyn’s emphasis that Courts often avoid creative interpretation of law in favor of deferring to Parliamentary sovereignty.
work must be submitted as a Word document (.doc/docx).
Please type your work in Arial, font size 12, spacing 1.5 and fully justified
2500 words (+/- 10%) excluding footnote referencing, a table of
authorities and bibliography.
referencing is OSCOLA please be careful with the citing in the footnotes if you are repeating a footnote write for example: ‘n3 found above’ concluding that footnote number 3 has the information.
you can use some of the cases i have in the file attached. the file also outlines how the introduction and main body should be.
USE CASES, ARTICLES, JOURNALS AND CITE ALL IN FOOTNOTES
MINIMUM 12 SOURCES